- Homer.JPG (32.68 KiB) Viewed 1001659 times
This is pretty long winded for me, but bear with me. Just my thoughts and opinions on the subject right now.
"Over the future, we see the day when most of this knowledge will be absorbed and forgotten by most. It will be replaced by the same thoughts and sayings of the past and of the present." - Buck Perry
The greatest anglers/Spoonpluggers were the originals - because they had to be. I’m sure you've all heard Buck state that before, but we now finally stand on a ledge overlooking our own demise, as every little step in technology along the way has slowly contributed to the death of Spoonplugging.
Spoonplugging; the orderly elimination of unproductive water. In the beginning, it was you, a simple boat and motor, and a bag of spoonplugs. Then the flasher came out, and you could now begin to find breaks, breaklines and structure without having to troll the lures all the time. You drew hand maps to remember everything, and added to those maps as you became more and more familiar over time. But a lot of people were never any good at fully undertsanding what a flasher could show you, and certainly didn't want to take the time and energy required to draw a map on the water.
Then came paper graphs that would draw a picture for you of what was downstairs, including the fish. It made things easier to interpret, but they were large and expensive, and only the most serious anglers had them. They required constantly buying paper, storing the old rolls, and occasional servicing.
When the first LCRs came out, they were crude compared to the paper graphs, actually a step behind in the interpretation world. But as technology improved, along with cost efficiencies, they eventually became on par with, and then superior to, paper graphs. You still had to map spots, create line sights, etc. in the early days, but that too, would change soon enough.
It happened when we got GPS technology, and especially the GPS in combination with the higher end LCD units. Yes, rifle sights were still more accurate than a GPS, partly because of SA (selective availability), so a Spoonplugger would still be the more effective angler, but now the masses didn't need to write down and remember every single spot, or every single break (which most wouldn't do anyway - Spoonpluggers did!). Again, you wouldn't be as good as a Spoonplugger, but it brought the recreational angler close enough that he too, would be able to catch more fish than he ever did before. It actually started getting some of them off the bank regularly, a place previously reserved for Spoonpluggers and only the most avid anglers (tourney guys included). It also created a culture of laziness, as now all some of these guys had to do was drive by a Spoonplugger sitting out in the open somewhere and push a button. Instantly he just marked the general spot that took that Spoonplugger years to find with his flasher/graph...and they eventually turned off SA making accuracy for the average person nearly as good as military grade - certainly good enough for just marking a fishing spot.
Technology continued to advance, and we then got side-imaging. Now you no longer needed to idle around for hours hoping to go directly over a stump or a breakline in order to find it. You simply set your range out 100 foot to either side, and made long passes in some type of pattern covering 200 feet in a single pass, marking every break, breakline or piece of structure you could see - which was most of them. The first time I got SI, I went out to a couple lakes I had been mapping for years and years. I had stuff marked that I know no one had ever taken the time to find. I missed very little...maybe it was a clump of 3 stumps instead of just one, but I had it on my map. The good news was that my maps were incredibly close to what was really there. I was amazed at all the stuff I had been able to find with years and years of time on the water and a flasher and paper graph. The bad news - I just "refound" all that stuff in one hour of idling around with my SI - and so could everyone else who had it. The first time I took it out on a new lake I hadn't ever fished before, I marked over 125 spots in about 2.5 hours of idling. It's just incredibly efficient.
Finding all this stuff, and marking and remembering, had just gotten easier still. And the picture that was created was actually a picture that people could relate to. Even with the advancement in pixelation that came with high end graphs, so many anglers still couldn't interpret what they saw. Now, SI actually created a photograph level picture of what was below the surface. Sure, everyone used the wrong terms, calling brushpiles and bridges and foundations "structure," but it didn't matter, because they still ended up finding and fishing these spots - proper terminology be damned.
Then came Power Poles and Spotlock trolling motors. Probably only 10% of bass anglers ever carried an anchor with them, but Spoonpluggers did, because we knew the value of sitting on the right spot and thoroughly checking depth and speed control, regardless of conditions. The average person, including the average bass angler, would never take the time and effort to throw out an anchor, or even pull it and reposition as necessary, maybe two or three times, until they knew they got the right spot that allowed them to reach the break or the breakline and get into the fish.
With Power Poles, anchoring on shallow structure just became as easy as pressing a button. Out deeper where the poles wouldn't reach, press another button and your trolling motor would hold you in a tight spot and not budge. Why get off the couch to change channels when you can just point a remote and click. The effort and learning it took us to develop proper boat positioning and control just became available to everyone, and people gladly paid for the convenience.
But Spoonpluggers still had their maps! Except, live mapping came to town along with high definition maps supplied by the sonar manufacturers, and that was another nail. Yes, you can argue that those maps aren't as detailed and exact as a Spoonpluggers, but again, who cares (relative to the average angler). The ones that don't want to take the time to do their own maps just use the 1 ft contour maps supplied with the unit. A good 90% of all breaklines and structures are probabaly captured by them, more than enough to keep most anglers occupied for a lifetime, and pull more anglers off the banks.
As SI and DI developed into "MEGA," pictures and ability to find fish just got easier and easier. Good anglers, or younger anglers who grew up with computers and technology to begin with, could now just drive around using their in-unit mapping and the incredible detail of SI/DI to actually see the schools of fish that Spoonpluggers had traditionally found by trolling. Even the smallest group of fish can now be picked up in most instances by an angler well versed in the use of his electronics, marked with a waypoint, and then held in position for casting with his PPs or Spotlock TM. Proper terminology is long gone at this point - no one even cares anymore. Use the maps, idle and find the fish, mark the fish, then try and catch them. But we're not through yet.
Now comes Livescope. It's been huge in the crappie world for about 3 years, but is just now gaining traction in a big way in the bass fishing world. Most every major tournament is being won with it. And if you've been paying attention this spring, you know huge numbers of big bass in Oklahoma and Texas have been caught with it in the past couple months. Buck said don't go out into sanctuary areas and run around looking for fish like a lost chicken, but Livescope is revealing just exctly where these big sanctuary bass (and crappie) have been "hiding." To add to that, depth and speed control, long the realm of Spoonpluggers, and one of the last things we had to hold onto, is now available to everyone. In the past, most anglers would never take the effort to check things like depth and speed out in the deeper waters, not to mention the aids of size and color and action - Now they can (and do) - with confidence, because they can see the fish RIGHT THERE in front of them, and they want to catch it.
You see the fish in real time on your scope. You watch your bait drop to his level and maintain the proper depth based on watching the screen. You can see how he reacts to your bait, try different speeds, colors, actions, until you trigger a bite. Only Spoonpluggers used to go through these procedures because we believed (even knew) that fish lived in these areas because of what Buck taught us about structure, breaks and breaklines. Almost nobody else had the discipline or patience to cycle through this process because they didn't have the knowledge (or belief) that the fish were there, and they couldn't see them. That is no longer an issue. They SEE them, live on their screen. Their lure is LIVE on their screen. It's now no different than playing a video game, and all the young anglers in the sport were all brought up on them (video games and technology). It's in their wheelhouse - it speaks their language - and their heads are buried in their units, something Buck warned us to not ever do.
And don't be fooled by the price tag! If your average minnow dunking crappie angler will snap up a Livescope unit for $3,000 (and they almost all have!), you better believe a guy with a $50,000+ bass boat will have it, too. That door, Pandora's box, has now been opened. They have seen the pros use it and win. They have seen the biggest bass in the lakes get caught with it this winter/spring. The reports are lines are out the door with people buying them up this week at the BPS Spring Classic sale going on now across the country at every BPS and Cabela's. And like all technology, with the increase in competition as Lowrance and Humminbird now release their units, plus the inevitable increase in technology yet again, prices will drop, and those who didn't initially purchase, will.
The last of the big schools will now all be found. Same with the last of the best structures, breaks and breaklines. Spoonplugging has nothing left to offer to the masses except trolling, and most bass anglers aren't interested in that. Its been that way since it was banned by the bass tournament organizations back in the 1950s, forever marking it as a pariah technique. It's "cheating," similar to the way live bait is also viewed for the same reasons (banned by bass tourney organizations).
So we at least have our summer speed triggers that will allow us to catch a few fish others won't...but that's about it. We have our history, our friendships, our terminology, and arguably a better understanding of the complete picture, but no one cares any more. Stand at a boat ramp and ask every bass angler coming off the water if they've seen or heard of Buck Perry or Spoonplugging. I'm guessing most will give you a very strange look.
In the end, Buck was right; it just took 75 years for technology to finally catch up to him and prove it. Spoonplugging as we know it will pass soon enough when we do. What they do after us could still be called spoonplugging, but it won't exist as we knew it. And though technology will continue to evolve, Livescope is the final nail in this coffin. We are the last - be sad, but be proud. It was a great run while it lasted!
"There will be no regrets or losses, but in the meantime we Spoonpluggers will continue to have a ball." - Buck Perry