Situation Approach
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 8:10 am
I’ve been away for awhile but back at it after rejoining the national organization and renewing basic skills. In my first go around I had stuck pretty much to trolling the shallows and with success and enjoyment in this. Thought I now would give working out deeper a go and have picked a known productive bar to attempt to map and fish. I’ve had some success in mapping but am struggling with the fishing approach.
The situation basically consists of bar sitting on a flat with a channel cutting through near to the bar end. An opposing short bar forms a ditch up to the shore which is a known hot spot. The weeds at the shore reach down to 7’. The large bar has an edge running out some 200 yards terminating in a narrow finger short of the channel by 20-25 feet. There is quickly 25’ of water around the finger and then a more gradual slope to the channel edge. The deeper bar edges are humped and brush tipped. The shallower sections have shells (one pulled up measuring 5 inches across). Water color is good.
I would suspect that focus in this situation would be primarily directed at the bar edge and that trolling passes wouldn’t be made across the entire width of the bar it being some 400 yards wide. I presume the approach would involve trolling along the outer weedline edge to some distance. Next, that the middle section would be worked with trolling passes back and forth across the bar edge. Alternatively, I guess that the edge could be trolled along its length working from in to out. The finger would be fished by trolling passes being made across the tip. (this seeming like the simplest part of the overall procedure).
The primary challenge would seem to be in depth control where presentation would need to be deep enough for passes to reach the edge (not to be hitting up higher on the bar) but not overly so as to avoid digging in and becoming hung. Turns would seem to need to be made briskly, especially on higher on the bar with a greater rise, shortly after coming across the edge to avoid hanging up. Casting would seem pretty much the same where lure size would need to be considered where a walking lure running too deep would have a tendency to be too frequently hung/fouled coming up over the edge through the shells and brush. Anchor choice would even need to be considered where the wind type could latch down into the brush and itself become hung.
Am I getting this right? Thoughts?
The situation basically consists of bar sitting on a flat with a channel cutting through near to the bar end. An opposing short bar forms a ditch up to the shore which is a known hot spot. The weeds at the shore reach down to 7’. The large bar has an edge running out some 200 yards terminating in a narrow finger short of the channel by 20-25 feet. There is quickly 25’ of water around the finger and then a more gradual slope to the channel edge. The deeper bar edges are humped and brush tipped. The shallower sections have shells (one pulled up measuring 5 inches across). Water color is good.
I would suspect that focus in this situation would be primarily directed at the bar edge and that trolling passes wouldn’t be made across the entire width of the bar it being some 400 yards wide. I presume the approach would involve trolling along the outer weedline edge to some distance. Next, that the middle section would be worked with trolling passes back and forth across the bar edge. Alternatively, I guess that the edge could be trolled along its length working from in to out. The finger would be fished by trolling passes being made across the tip. (this seeming like the simplest part of the overall procedure).
The primary challenge would seem to be in depth control where presentation would need to be deep enough for passes to reach the edge (not to be hitting up higher on the bar) but not overly so as to avoid digging in and becoming hung. Turns would seem to need to be made briskly, especially on higher on the bar with a greater rise, shortly after coming across the edge to avoid hanging up. Casting would seem pretty much the same where lure size would need to be considered where a walking lure running too deep would have a tendency to be too frequently hung/fouled coming up over the edge through the shells and brush. Anchor choice would even need to be considered where the wind type could latch down into the brush and itself become hung.
Am I getting this right? Thoughts?